Comparing Reactive vs. Preventive vs. Predictive Maintenance Strategies

October 19, 2024
Dr.-Ing. Simon Spelzhausen
Reactive vs Predictive vs Preventive Maintenance

Reactive vs Preventive vs Predictive Maintenance: What’s Right for Your Factory?

Maintenance strategies are no longer just about repairs — they’re about preventing downtime, protecting assets, and driving operational performance. In 2025, most manufacturers are still weighing the practical differences between preventive maintenance, predictive analytics, and reactive response.

While predictive systems powered by AI are promising, the reality is: many factories are still operating in hybrid mode — combining scheduled routines with reactive firefighting. Predictive tech remains aspirational for most due to the need for high-quality data and sensors.

This guide breaks it down for busy maintenance leads and plant managers:

  • The core differences between preventive, predictive, and reactive maintenance
  • Which strategy fits your factory’s scale and team maturity
  • What 2025 looks like for manufacturers adopting digital tools
  • Why Makula focuses on preventive-first workflows (no IoT required)

1. Understanding Reactive Maintenance

Reactive maintenance, also known as breakdown maintenance, refers to repairs that are conducted when equipment has already failed or shown signs of failing. Unlike preventive maintenance, which is scheduled and proactive, reactive maintenance is performed only after a malfunction occurs.

This approach can be necessary in scenarios where the cost of preventive maintenance exceeds the cost of repairing a breakdown, or where the equipment does not critically affect operations.

Common use cases include:

  • Non-critical Equipment: Assets where failure doesn’t significantly affect safety or output.
  • Cost-Prohibitive Preventive Maintenance: Especially with cheaper, older machines.
  • Simplified Operations: Favoured by small or less complex facilities.
  • Residential and Small-scale Use: Like appliances and office equipment.

✅ Pros of Reactive Maintenance

  • Lower initial costs: minimal investment in planning and tooling.
  • Simplicity: fix as needed — no scheduling required.
  • Reduced planning overhead: works in casual or flexible environments.

⚠️ Cons of Reactive Maintenance

  • Higher long-term costs: emergency repairs and rush orders pile up.
  • Increased downtime: disrupts workflow and causes delays.
  • Shorter equipment life: poor upkeep reduces lifespan.
  • Safety concerns: surprise failures can create hazardous conditions.
  • Low predictability: planning budgets and timelines is harder.
  • Operational inefficiency: more energy usage and wear over time.

Approximately 82% of companies have encountered at least one unplanned downtime event in the past three years. Source: Forbes Tech Council

1

Reactive Maintenance

Fix equipment only after failure. Lower upfront costs, but higher long-term risk due to unplanned downtime and reduced asset life.

2

Preventive Maintenance

Scheduled servicing to avoid failure. Higher planning cost upfront, but extends asset lifespan and lowers emergency fixes.

3

Predictive Maintenance

Forecasts failures using data and analytics. Requires high initial investment and skilled teams, but offers lowest downtime risk.

2. Transitioning to Preventive Maintenance

Preventive maintenance is a systematic approach to maintaining equipment by performing regular checks and servicing before failures occur. This strategy is key to preventing unplanned downtime and costly emergency repairs. In 2020, 76% of global manufacturing firms placed a high priority on preventive maintenance.

Why Shift from Reactive to Preventive?

Companies save 12% to 18% by choosing preventive over reactive maintenance, with every dollar spent on PM averting $5 in future costs. Reactive maintenance often leads to unexpected breakdowns and higher costs. Transitioning to preventive maintenance reduces these incidents by maintaining equipment proactively, thus ensuring higher reliability and operational efficiency.

Significance in Modern Industry

Implementing preventive maintenance is crucial for optimising equipment efficiency and longevity. It minimises the frequency of equipment failures, reduces operational costs, and enhances workplace safety. In fact, preventive maintenance is preferred by 80% of maintenance personnel as a core element of an effective maintenance strategy.

By adopting this proactive approach, organisations can ensure consistent production levels and improved output quality.

Approaches to Preventive Maintenance

  • Time-Based Maintenance (TBM): Scheduled at fixed intervals based on manufacturer guidance or operational data. For instance, lubricating machinery every 6 months or replacing HVAC filters quarterly.
  • Usage-Based Maintenance (UBM): Also called condition-based maintenance, this approach relies on actual usage and equipment performance. Maintenance is triggered by thresholds such as running hours, vibration levels, or sensor data.

Examples of Preventive Maintenance

  • Lubrication: Regular greasing of bearings and gears.
  • Cleaning: Removing dust or buildup from motors and fans.
  • Filter Replacement: Ensuring air, oil, and hydraulic filters are fresh.
  • Fastener Tightening: Avoiding misalignment and vibration issues.
  • Visual Inspection: Spotting cracks, leaks, or damage early.
  • Vibration Analysis: Monitoring abnormal patterns in bearings.
  • Temperature Monitoring: Identifying overheating components.
  • Oil Analysis: Detecting wear particles in lubricants.
  • Performance Monitoring: Watching KPIs like cycle time and output quality.

✅ Pros of Preventive Maintenance

  • Reduces unplanned downtime and production disruptions.
  • Saves costs by avoiding emergency repairs.
  • Extends equipment lifespan significantly.
  • Improves safety and working conditions.
  • Boosts after-sales and parts demand through consistency.

⚠️ Cons of Preventive Maintenance

  • Higher initial setup and ongoing resource investment.
  • Demands scheduling, planning, and dedicated personnel.
  • Challenging for operations with diverse or legacy machinery.

📊 Makula Insights

Preventive

Maintenance Strategy

✅ Pros

  • Minimises unexpected downtime
  • Reduces need for expensive repairs
  • Extends equipment lifespan
  • Increases customer loyalty
  • Reduces risk of accidents

⚠️ Cons

  • High setup and ongoing costs
  • Time and resources needed
  • Complex scheduling and adherence

3. Advancing to Predictive Maintenance: The Future

Moving from preventive to predictive maintenance marks a strategic evolution. Predictive maintenance leverages real-time data to forecast equipment failures before they occur. This shift minimises unnecessary servicing and downtime, significantly improving operational efficiency.

Importance of Predictive Maintenance Services

Predictive maintenance transforms traditional maintenance by using data-driven insights to anticipate failures. Instead of reacting to issues, teams can proactively address them, avoiding the disruptions of unplanned breakdowns and ensuring uninterrupted operations.

The Tech Trio: IoT, AI, and Machine Learning

  • IoT Sensors: Collect real-time data on machine performance and condition. By 2030, IIoT technologies are expected to generate nearly $12.6 trillion in economic value.
  • AI Analytics: Analyse patterns, detect anomalies, and trigger alerts based on potential failure trends.
  • Machine Learning Models: Continuously improve predictions through exposure to operational data, increasing accuracy over time.

✅ Pros of Predictive Maintenance

  • Reduces downtime by addressing faults before failure occurs.
  • Enhances cost-efficiency by reducing unnecessary maintenance.
  • Extends equipment lifespan, delivering long-term ROI.
  • Improves safety by identifying potential hazards early.

⚠️ Cons of Predictive Maintenance

  • High initial investment in tech and training.
  • Requires sophisticated data management tools and skills.
  • Integration challenges with legacy systems.

📊 Makula Insights

Predictive

Maintenance Strategy

✅ Pros

  • Reduced downtime through early detection
  • Improved cost efficiency and ROI
  • Enhances workplace safety by identifying hazards in advance

⚠️ Cons

  • High initial investment in tech and training
  • Complex data management and interpretation
  • Integration with legacy systems can be difficult

4. How to Select the Right Maintenance Strategy for Your Needs

Choosing the appropriate maintenance approach isn’t one-size-fits-all. It depends on your equipment, operations, resources, and long-term goals. Here are key decision points to guide your selection:

  • Assess Equipment Criticality: Determine which machines are vital to operations. High-criticality assets may need predictive maintenance, while non-critical ones may suit reactive strategies.
  • Consider Operational Impact: Evaluate how downtime affects your bottom line. If production loss or safety issues are major risks, preventive or predictive methods are essential.
  • Evaluate Budget Constraints: Reactive may seem cheaper up front, but long-term costs can mount. Weigh the investment of prevention vs. the unpredictability of reactive fixes.
  • Analyse Existing Capabilities: Predictive maintenance requires strong digital infrastructure and skilled teams. Understand what your team can realistically implement and manage.
  • Align with Strategic Goals: If your focus is efficiency, safety, and lifecycle cost reduction, a more structured strategy (preventive or predictive) will align better with your vision.

🔍 Maintenance Strategy Comparison

Strategy
Reactive
Cost Impact
Low upfront, high over time
Downtime Risk
Very high
Tools Required
None
Best Fit For
Low-priority assets or early-stage teams
Strategy
Preventive
Cost Impact
Medium
Downtime Risk
Medium
Tools Required
CMMS, schedules
Best Fit For
Most factories today
Strategy
Predictive
Cost Impact
High upfront, high ROI
Downtime Risk
Low
Tools Required
AI, sensors, data history
Best Fit For
Mature ops with digital readiness

🔧 Optimise Your Maintenance Strategy with Makula Digital Asset Management

Why Makula’s Preventive Stack Is the Smarter Choice

Predictive maintenance sounds great — but it often requires sensors, deep integrations, and high investment that many factories just aren't ready for.

Makula offers a more practical route: With Asset Hub, you can set up smart preventive maintenance events based on usage or time, while CMMS and Field Service capabilities ensure fast, clear execution via mobile-first work order management.

  • ✅ Preventive events managed in Asset Hub — fully customisable, repeatable, and rule-based
  • ✅ CMMS and Field Service workflows for executing tasks, assigning technicians, and closing the loop
  • AI Machinery Assistant for instant technical answers from manuals
  • ✅ Built to modernise maintenance operations for both OEMs and factories — no IoT required

You don’t need predictive AI to run a smarter shop floor. Makula helps you digitise preventive and reactive maintenance workflows — fast, reliably, and without complexity.

See Makula CMMS in Action

Ready to modernise your maintenance strategy? Explore how Makula combines powerful asset management, preventive planning, and mobile-first execution — all in one clean platform.

Book a Free Demo

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the biggest difference between preventive and predictive maintenance?
Preventive maintenance follows a schedule regardless of equipment condition. Predictive maintenance uses data to forecast failures and only performs maintenance when it's actually needed — but requires sensors and investment.
Can small or mid-sized factories use predictive maintenance?
They can, but it depends on digital maturity. For most SMBs, preventive maintenance with a CMMS like Makula is a more cost-effective, low-friction solution.
Does Makula offer predictive maintenance features?
Makula does not offer traditional predictive maintenance via sensors. Instead, we provide Industrial AI tools — like our AI Machinery Assistant and Enterprise Search — to make preventive and reactive workflows smarter.
Is it possible to combine reactive and preventive maintenance?
Absolutely. In fact, most real-world factories use a mix — reacting to failures for low-priority assets, and scheduling preventive events for critical equipment using Asset Hub + CMMS.
Dr.-Ing. Simon Spelzhausen
Co Founder & Chief Product Officer

Simon Spelzhausen, an engineering expert with a proven track record of driving business growth through innovative solutions, honed through his experience at Volkswagen.