What are the differences between popular work order management solutions?

October 29, 2025
Dr.-Ing. Simon Spelzhausen

Selecting the right work order software is more than just a purchasing decision, it has an impact on uptime, tech productivity, spare parts costs and how quickly your team moves from reactive fixes to preventive maintenance. The market is broken into specialized tools (CMMS, EAM, FSM) and lesser weight ticketing systems; the first is developed around a point of emphasis such as depth of asset, dispatch prowess or a pricing leverage strategy. This post will go through the practicals of what those differences are, and where Makula CMMS can be positioned as a robust cost-effective solution for teams that need modern work order systems with inventory and mobile capabilities.

Four types of solutions at a glance

CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management System): Asset-based maintenance: preventive scheduling, work orders, parts and maintenance history. Maintenance teams around the world choose to use CMMS for managing assets and spare parts.

EAM (Enterprise Asset Management): Asset lifecycle management at enterprise scale — planning, capex/opex alignment, long-term asset strategies. Best for large companies with busy asset portfolios.

FSM (Field Service Management): Designed for dispatch-heavy businesses—route optimization, SLAs, technician mobile workflows and customer-facing service features.

Ticketing/Helpdesk: Small load request tracking and task assignment usually for IT or general facilities where asset depth and inventory control is not a priority.

Important differences that could influence your decision

Asset model & workorder depth

The biggest day-to-day difference is how much an app knows about your holdings. CMMS and EAM software model components, sub-components, BOMs and preventive schedules. Ephemeral requests for change with little context into the things we own Most ticketing systems treat tasks as such. If you require history, MTTR tracking or lifecycle reports then asset depth becomes important.

Scheduling, dispatch & SLAs

FSMs win when you require efficient routing, sla enforcement and ETA tracking for field technicians. Newer CMMS systems are adding on dispatch boards and scheduling but FSM is best of breed for customer facing activities. If your business require both maintenance and customer service dispatch, seek platforms that combine CMMS and FSM functionality.

Mobile technician experience

Accessing from mobile is no longer a nice-to-have – techs must be able to see work history, scan barcodes/QRs, input labour time and close orders all from the field. Strong mobile UX and offline capability in platforms drive adoption, improved data-quality leading to lower rework and less waste of spare-parts.

Inventory & spare parts integration

If replacement part costs are significant in your operation, choose a system with integrated inventory, min/max rules and location tracking. It’s also common for CMMS and EAM to have more robust inventory controls than ticketing tools; FSMs will vary depending on whether they are geared toward service companies with more parts-heavy workflows.

Integrations & APIs

True value comes when your work order software exchanges data with ERP, procurement, payroll, or IoT sensors. Look for platforms that boast powerful APIs and out-of-the-box integrations to allow work order events to trigger procurement, warranty checks, or conditional-based maintenance.

Pricing models & TCO

Vendors typically price per user (per-tech/month), per asset, or by feature modules. Watch for hidden costs: onboarding, data migration, integrations, and limits on the number of assets or documents. Never neglect TCO – sometimes a little higher license fee is worth the investment if you buy down automation that cuts downtime and labor costs.

How the market looks in 2026 (buyer’s take)

Based on the user reviews and various market guides, we find buyers looking for : A mobile-first design, Fast Time to Value, Easy job work order creation Clear pricing MaintainX, Fiix, Limble and a few other CMMS providers are often cited as those leading the way or setting the bar for user experience and mobile features. (When you construct your own positioning (for Makula CMMS), home in on the pain points reviewers point to: adoption friction, complicated set up, and opaque pricing.

Why Makula CMMS

Asset first work order management: Makula is deployed to give the maintenance team a single source of truth for assets and work orders — history, attached manuals and BOMs included - so that technicians spend less time searching.

Mobile-first for faster adoption: Field technicians can create, update and close work orders on mobile (also offline) to minimize paperwork and enhance data quality.

Inventory & purchase-ready: Makula integrates spare-parts tracking into the work-order flow so that parts consumption, reorder triggers and location transparency are done automatically.

Clear pricing to fit your needs: Made for small-to-mid sized teams as well as multi-site operators, Makula’s flexible licensing means that you only pay for what you use (per-user and per-asset or modular).

Rapid deployment & support: Short onboarding time-frames and relevant role-based training equate to faster victories, and measurable ROI.

Buyer’s Checklist:

Score each item 0–5 for your company and weight by importance (i.e., mobile = 30% for field teams):

  1. Supported Asset modeling depth (BOMs, Atomic assets)
  2. Mobile app + offline support
  3. Scheduling/dispatch and route optimization
  4. Inventory control and parts management
  5. API & integrations (ERP, achats, IoT)
  6. Transparent pricing & predictable TCO
  7. Security, audit trail and role based permissions
  8. Mis and KPI reports dashboards (MTTR, MTBF, DoWn Time)
  9. Vendor support & implementation timelines
  10. User training on adoption and change management

Quick real-world examples

Board plant: Selected CMMS for managing asset life cycle and preventive maintenance to minimize downtime.

Field service company: first deployed an FSM for optimal routes and SLAs then added a simple CMMS for part tracking.

Campus university: Leveraged a ticketing system for general requests, but adopted CMMS for core HVAC and life safety/disaster-protected assets to accommodate regulatory compliance.

These are examples of why the blending (robust mobile CMMS + dispatch capabilities) often wins out.

Migration & implementation tips

  1. Begin with a data-cleanup sprint: assets, vendors and spare-parts SKUs and critical processes.
  2. Run a pilot: select one site or asset class and “prove value” – or don’t.
  3. Train to adopt: Mobile-first training On-the-Job for technicians and brief manager dashboard for supervisors.
  4. Track quick wins, such as decreased time-to-close work orders, emergency repairs or reductions in parts costs.

Dr.-Ing. Simon Spelzhausen
Co Founder & Chief Product Officer

Simon Spelzhausen, an engineering expert with a proven track record of driving business growth through innovative solutions, honed through his experience at Volkswagen.